I’m angry at Stanley. I’ve just been for a wander around the local giant hardware store and there’s more and more of their lines being replaced with cheap looking plastic filled nonsense.
They used to be like IBM, nobody every got fired for buying Stanley, but now I don’t think there’s very many of their products I’d use even if given to me. It’s all made in china, rough edges and weak parts instead of the quality, solid tools they used to make.
I used to think the local hardware store lines went in this order – Craftright/Sontax -> Trojan -> Stanley ->Irwin with Eclipse sitting up towards the top for when they did make something. Now I think I’d buy Trojan before Stanley, at least they make no secret of being a lower end line and some of their stuff is of surprising quality.
While I’m on this rant, I’m not happy with the quality of even the ‘good’ tools. You buy the best you can afford for a tool, and find there’s rough milling that should have been cleaned up, like the surface on the Eclipse combo squares. It’s rough as anything so basically needs to be lapped before you can get good results. The brass locking pins fall out at the drop of a hat and it’s an absolute pain to get them back together. And don’t get me started on saws…
I’m also angry at the buying public, myself included. It’s us that want rock bottom prices instead of quality and are happy to replace an item in 6 months instead of expecting to hand it to our children. It’s us that buy the low end tools, forcing the makers to produce cheap imitations of their original products to try and stay competitive. What we should be doing is avoiding the ‘instant gratification’ that we get from having massive tool collections and saving for a few good quality tools.
My favorite explanations of why spending a bit more on quality is worth it in the long run is from Terry Pratchett’s “Men at Arms” novel, where the policeman character earned $28 a month and couldn’t afford quality, but knew it’s worth
“A really good pair of leather boots, the sort that would last years and years, cost fifty dollars. This was beyond his pocket and the most he could hope for was an affordable pair of boots costing ten dollars, which might with luck last a year or so before he would need to resort to makeshift cardboard insoles so as to prolong the moment of shelling out another ten dollars.
Therefore over a period of ten years, he might have paid out a hundred dollars on boots, twice as much as the man who could afford fifty dollars up front ten years before. And he would still have wet feet.”
The majority of my tools are old and carefully restored. I get good service out of them and trust them to do the job time after time. I get the exact opposite feeling with most new tools (a few good power tool makers excluded) and can see it’s just a matter of time before they fall apart.
I’m saving my pennies for quality rather than quantity. I hope you’ll do the same and together we might just be able to force the major toolmakers to rethink the cheapening of their lines.